<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1803 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470947</link>
    <description>Inherent power to quash criminal proceedings may be exercised sparingly where accepted allegations disclose no offence, are inherently improbable, or indicate mala fide prosecution. Matrimonial cruelty requires allegations of conduct meeting the statutory definition, including harassment linked to an unlawful demand for property or valuable security. Bald, general and omnibus allegations against parents-in-law, without particulars of dates, places or specific acts, do not establish a prima facie offence and warrant quashing of proceedings against them. Allegations against the husband were not examined on merits, and prosecution against him continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1803 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470947</link>
      <description>Inherent power to quash criminal proceedings may be exercised sparingly where accepted allegations disclose no offence, are inherently improbable, or indicate mala fide prosecution. Matrimonial cruelty requires allegations of conduct meeting the statutory definition, including harassment linked to an unlawful demand for property or valuable security. Bald, general and omnibus allegations against parents-in-law, without particulars of dates, places or specific acts, do not establish a prima facie offence and warrant quashing of proceedings against them. Allegations against the husband were not examined on merits, and prosecution against him continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>