<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 233 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53237</link>
    <description>Imported medical equipment qualified for exemption under the research-institution notifications because the importer was a recognised research institution engaged in cardiac research and registered with the competent scientific authority. Collection of charges for treatment or diagnosis did not, by itself, make the institution commercial, as commercial activity has a distinct legal meaning and the institution operated on a no profit, no loss basis. The exemption was therefore available and denial of the benefit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:20:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 233 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53237</link>
      <description>Imported medical equipment qualified for exemption under the research-institution notifications because the importer was a recognised research institution engaged in cardiac research and registered with the competent scientific authority. Collection of charges for treatment or diagnosis did not, by itself, make the institution commercial, as commercial activity has a distinct legal meaning and the institution operated on a no profit, no loss basis. The exemption was therefore available and denial of the benefit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>