<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 977 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470946</link>
    <description>Revision under Section 263 requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Disclosed write-offs in audited accounts were considered during assessment after necessary enquiries. Where allowability of the write-offs permits two legally sustainable views, the Assessing Officer&#039;s adoption of one permissible view is not erroneous merely because the Commissioner prefers another. The revisionary order was therefore invalid, and the assessment order was restored in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 977 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470946</link>
      <description>Revision under Section 263 requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Disclosed write-offs in audited accounts were considered during assessment after necessary enquiries. Where allowability of the write-offs permits two legally sustainable views, the Assessing Officer&#039;s adoption of one permissible view is not erroneous merely because the Commissioner prefers another. The revisionary order was therefore invalid, and the assessment order was restored in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>