<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 175 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53231</link>
    <description>A statutory tribunal may, on sound judicial principles and in the peculiar facts of a case, grant relief against revocation of a CHA licence despite proven misuse of the licence by permitting third parties to use it and sign export documents. Here, the long suspension and subsequent revocation were treated as sufficient grounds to revive the licence from 1-7-2004, reflecting discretionary leniency after a substantial deprivation of livelihood. The separate forfeiture of the security deposit was left undisturbed, as revocation relief did not require interference with that independent consequence, and fresh security could still be insisted upon as a condition of revival.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 175 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53231</link>
      <description>A statutory tribunal may, on sound judicial principles and in the peculiar facts of a case, grant relief against revocation of a CHA licence despite proven misuse of the licence by permitting third parties to use it and sign export documents. Here, the long suspension and subsequent revocation were treated as sufficient grounds to revive the licence from 1-7-2004, reflecting discretionary leniency after a substantial deprivation of livelihood. The separate forfeiture of the security deposit was left undisturbed, as revocation relief did not require interference with that independent consequence, and fresh security could still be insisted upon as a condition of revival.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>