<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 848 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796974</link>
    <description>SARFAESI measures initiated through a demand notice and an order for assistance in taking possession are subject to the statutory remedial mechanism before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Article 226 ordinarily cannot be invoked to bypass that efficacious alternative remedy unless extraordinary circumstances justify writ intervention. Writ jurisdiction was therefore declined, leaving the aggrieved party to pursue the statutory remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 848 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796974</link>
      <description>SARFAESI measures initiated through a demand notice and an order for assistance in taking possession are subject to the statutory remedial mechanism before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Article 226 ordinarily cannot be invoked to bypass that efficacious alternative remedy unless extraordinary circumstances justify writ intervention. Writ jurisdiction was therefore declined, leaving the aggrieved party to pursue the statutory remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>