<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 850 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796976</link>
    <description>Conditional refund or credit linked to the validity challenge against Notifications No. 19/2008 and 34/2008, together with refund claims involving alleged fictitious clearances, no longer required adjudication in the Revenue appeal. The appeal was disposed of as not surviving. Revenue retains the ability to take further action in accordance with the applicable Supreme Court decision and the pending show-cause proceedings concerning the alleged clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 850 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796976</link>
      <description>Conditional refund or credit linked to the validity challenge against Notifications No. 19/2008 and 34/2008, together with refund claims involving alleged fictitious clearances, no longer required adjudication in the Revenue appeal. The appeal was disposed of as not surviving. Revenue retains the ability to take further action in accordance with the applicable Supreme Court decision and the pending show-cause proceedings concerning the alleged clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>