<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 855 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796981</link>
    <description>Qualifying construction services supplied by a subcontractor through a main contractor for a Government reservoir dam and irrigation project are exempt from service tax where the underlying project falls within the applicable exemption. Taxable receipts must receive cum-tax valuation, and any liability falling on the service recipient under applicable reverse-charge provisions must be excluded from the provider&#039;s demand after verification. Exempt turnover must therefore be removed and the remaining liability, including penalty, recalculated proportionately. However, a challenge based on higher receipts reflected in profit and loss accounts and Form 26AS fails where no specific error in the discrepancy determination is identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 855 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796981</link>
      <description>Qualifying construction services supplied by a subcontractor through a main contractor for a Government reservoir dam and irrigation project are exempt from service tax where the underlying project falls within the applicable exemption. Taxable receipts must receive cum-tax valuation, and any liability falling on the service recipient under applicable reverse-charge provisions must be excluded from the provider&#039;s demand after verification. Exempt turnover must therefore be removed and the remaining liability, including penalty, recalculated proportionately. However, a challenge based on higher receipts reflected in profit and loss accounts and Form 26AS fails where no specific error in the discrepancy determination is identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>