<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 230 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to proceed with the appeals without a stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, waiving pre-deposit. The duty demand on iron ore fines was dropped, but the case was remanded for fresh decision on the maintainability of appeals by the Revenue. The Tribunal also remanded the case regarding the process of sieving iron ore pellets. The appeals were allowed for further review by the Commissioner (Appeals) to provide detailed findings and pass fresh orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 230 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to proceed with the appeals without a stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, waiving pre-deposit. The duty demand on iron ore fines was dropped, but the case was remanded for fresh decision on the maintainability of appeals by the Revenue. The Tribunal also remanded the case regarding the process of sieving iron ore pellets. The appeals were allowed for further review by the Commissioner (Appeals) to provide detailed findings and pass fresh orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>