<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 888 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797014</link>
    <description>Transfer-pricing comparables may be excluded where the proposed company&#039;s functions, products or end-use materially differ from those of the tested party, particularly where reliable segmental data is unavailable. Bilcare Ltd. was unsuitable because its diverse pharmaceutical packaging and service activities differed from paper-based aseptic food-and-beverage packaging, and current-year segmental data was absent. Karur KCP Packaging Ltd. was also unsuitable because its kraft paper and polypropylene bags served the cement industry and differed in products and end-use. These fact-specific exclusions do not raise a substantial question of law absent perversity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:18:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 888 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797014</link>
      <description>Transfer-pricing comparables may be excluded where the proposed company&#039;s functions, products or end-use materially differ from those of the tested party, particularly where reliable segmental data is unavailable. Bilcare Ltd. was unsuitable because its diverse pharmaceutical packaging and service activities differed from paper-based aseptic food-and-beverage packaging, and current-year segmental data was absent. Karur KCP Packaging Ltd. was also unsuitable because its kraft paper and polypropylene bags served the cement industry and differed in products and end-use. These fact-specific exclusions do not raise a substantial question of law absent perversity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>