<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470916</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on goods transport agency services was admissible only where the services were established as used for transporting raw materials. Credit attributable to such transportation services was eligible, while the remaining disputed credit relating to construction services was not. The impugned order was set aside only to the extent of the admissible goods transport agency service credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470916</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on goods transport agency services was admissible only where the services were established as used for transporting raw materials. Credit attributable to such transportation services was eligible, while the remaining disputed credit relating to construction services was not. The impugned order was set aside only to the extent of the admissible goods transport agency service credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>