<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 171 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53223</link>
    <description>Prima facie entitlement to exemption at the time of clearance can support waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, even if the essentiality certificate is later withdrawn retrospectively. The tribunal treated the later withdrawal as insufficient at the interim stage to deny benefit under Notification No. 10/97-C.E., and noted that duty had already been paid at 8% of the invoice price under Rule 57CC. The request for early disposal of the appeal was rejected because no sufficient ground was shown for advancing the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 171 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53223</link>
      <description>Prima facie entitlement to exemption at the time of clearance can support waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, even if the essentiality certificate is later withdrawn retrospectively. The tribunal treated the later withdrawal as insufficient at the interim stage to deny benefit under Notification No. 10/97-C.E., and noted that duty had already been paid at 8% of the invoice price under Rule 57CC. The request for early disposal of the appeal was rejected because no sufficient ground was shown for advancing the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>