<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2261 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470930</link>
    <description>Search-related penalty under section 271AAB displaces section 271(1)(c) only for undisclosed income of a statutorily defined specified previous year. Where a search occurred on 04.02.2016, only assessment year 2016-17 qualified; penalty under section 271(1)(c) for that year was void, while section 271(1)(c) remained potentially applicable to earlier years. For assessment years 2010-11 to 2015-16, additions of deemed annual letting value based on disallowed vacancy allowance could not support penalty where property details and actual rent were fully disclosed. Rejection of a claim, without false, incorrect, or incomplete particulars, does not establish concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Penalties for all years were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2261 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470930</link>
      <description>Search-related penalty under section 271AAB displaces section 271(1)(c) only for undisclosed income of a statutorily defined specified previous year. Where a search occurred on 04.02.2016, only assessment year 2016-17 qualified; penalty under section 271(1)(c) for that year was void, while section 271(1)(c) remained potentially applicable to earlier years. For assessment years 2010-11 to 2015-16, additions of deemed annual letting value based on disallowed vacancy allowance could not support penalty where property details and actual rent were fully disclosed. Rejection of a claim, without false, incorrect, or incomplete particulars, does not establish concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Penalties for all years were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>