https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53219 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, as the discrepancies in received quantities never exceeded 0.5%, and the explanation provided by the appellants regarding weigh-bridge differences was deemed plausible. The tribunal emphasized the absence of evidence of deliberate evasion or underpayment, supported by previous tribunal decisions allowing the practice of ignoring marginal differences in received quantities. en-us Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:15:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53219 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, as the discrepancies in received quantities never exceeded 0.5%, and the explanation provided by the appellants regarding weigh-bridge differences was deemed plausible. The tribunal emphasized the absence of evidence of deliberate evasion or underpayment, supported by previous tribunal decisions allowing the practice of ignoring marginal differences in received quantities. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53219