<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed invoices.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102656</link>
    <description>Registration of a partnership firm was proved by the Registrar of Firms&#039; memorandum and a certified Form-VIII admitted as additional evidence because it enabled judgment and furthered justice. The firm was therefore competent to institute the suit. Limitation for invoice-based recovery was not extended or suspended by winding-up proceedings, which are independent of a civil money-recovery suit. The claim was based on individual invoices rather than a running account, and the relied-on communication neither acknowledged the disputed debt nor constituted part-payment for those invoices. As the relevant invoices were already time-barred, the recovery suit was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:58:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed invoices.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102656</link>
      <description>Registration of a partnership firm was proved by the Registrar of Firms&#039; memorandum and a certified Form-VIII admitted as additional evidence because it enabled judgment and furthered justice. The firm was therefore competent to institute the suit. Limitation for invoice-based recovery was not extended or suspended by winding-up proceedings, which are independent of a civil money-recovery suit. The claim was based on individual invoices rather than a running account, and the relied-on communication neither acknowledged the disputed debt nor constituted part-payment for those invoices. As the relevant invoices were already time-barred, the recovery suit was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:58:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>