<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 243 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53212</link>
    <description>Credit was denied on imported inputs to the extent the goods were short received in the factory compared with the import documents, because credit cannot be retained on quantities not actually received; the explanations based on calibration difference and temperature variation were rejected. The text also states that, although the demand was sustained, the penalty equal to duty was reduced under Section 11AC, and the separate penalty on the manager was set aside, reflecting moderation of penal consequences on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 243 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53212</link>
      <description>Credit was denied on imported inputs to the extent the goods were short received in the factory compared with the import documents, because credit cannot be retained on quantities not actually received; the explanations based on calibration difference and temperature variation were rejected. The text also states that, although the demand was sustained, the penalty equal to duty was reduced under Section 11AC, and the separate penalty on the manager was set aside, reflecting moderation of penal consequences on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>