<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 800 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796926</link>
    <description>Interference with a High Court&#039;s interim arrangement was not warranted where the arrangement was balanced and adequately protected the interests of all parties. The merits remained reserved for determination in pending writ proceedings, and no view was expressed on those merits. The Special Leave Petitions were disposed of without disturbing the interim order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 800 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796926</link>
      <description>Interference with a High Court&#039;s interim arrangement was not warranted where the arrangement was balanced and adequately protected the interests of all parties. The merits remained reserved for determination in pending writ proceedings, and no view was expressed on those merits. The Special Leave Petitions were disposed of without disturbing the interim order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>