<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 815 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796941</link>
    <description>Interim safeguards for clearance of ongoing and future imports required a balance between the Revenue&#039;s duty-recovery interests and the importer&#039;s entitlement under the existing appellate order. Arguable issues were reserved for final hearing, making an unconditional stay inappropriate. Pending the appeal, the importer may provisionally clear consignments by furnishing a bond covering the full differential duty and a bank guarantee for 50% of that duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 815 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796941</link>
      <description>Interim safeguards for clearance of ongoing and future imports required a balance between the Revenue&#039;s duty-recovery interests and the importer&#039;s entitlement under the existing appellate order. Arguable issues were reserved for final hearing, making an unconditional stay inappropriate. Pending the appeal, the importer may provisionally clear consignments by furnishing a bond covering the full differential duty and a bank guarantee for 50% of that duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>