<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 829 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796955</link>
    <description>Interim restraint on processing income-tax returns filed by sitting judges was modified because the automated system could not independently identify those returns. Identification details were required to enable exclusion of the relevant returns from processing while allowing other returns to be processed without disruption. The modification application was disposed of, and the writ petition remains pending without final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 829 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796955</link>
      <description>Interim restraint on processing income-tax returns filed by sitting judges was modified because the automated system could not independently identify those returns. Identification details were required to enable exclusion of the relevant returns from processing while allowing other returns to be processed without disruption. The modification application was disposed of, and the writ petition remains pending without final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>