<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 842 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796968</link>
    <description>Non-consideration of a taxpayer&#039;s written reply to a GST show cause cum demand notice breaches principles of natural justice, even where opportunities for personal hearing were provided. An ex parte adjudication issued without addressing the detailed reply is legally infirm. The adjudicating authority must consider the reply, provide an effective hearing, and issue a fresh reasoned decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 842 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796968</link>
      <description>Non-consideration of a taxpayer&#039;s written reply to a GST show cause cum demand notice breaches principles of natural justice, even where opportunities for personal hearing were provided. An ex parte adjudication issued without addressing the detailed reply is legally infirm. The adjudicating authority must consider the reply, provide an effective hearing, and issue a fresh reasoned decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>