https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470885 Challenges to an order approving a resolution plan lie before the Appellate Tribunal and cannot be pursued before the adjudicating authority through an application under Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The request to set aside the approved plan was therefore not maintainable. A creditor that did not submit its claim by the published CIRP deadline, or seek condonation of delay, could not secure admission of a belated claim based on Regulation 6A, which came into force after the relevant CIRP. The approved resolution plan consequently remained undisturbed, and the delayed claim received no relief. en-us Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:10:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470885 Challenges to an order approving a resolution plan lie before the Appellate Tribunal and cannot be pursued before the adjudicating authority through an application under Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The request to set aside the approved plan was therefore not maintainable. A creditor that did not submit its claim by the published CIRP deadline, or seek condonation of delay, could not secure admission of a belated claim based on Regulation 6A, which came into force after the relevant CIRP. The approved resolution plan consequently remained undisturbed, and the delayed claim received no relief. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470885