<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 210 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a PSU Unit, in a case challenging the inclusion of bonus in the assessable value of goods. The appellant argued that the bonus, received post-clearance and duty payment, should not be part of the assessable value as it related to post-sale considerations. Citing precedents, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s position, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 210 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a PSU Unit, in a case challenging the inclusion of bonus in the assessable value of goods. The appellant argued that the bonus, received post-clearance and duty payment, should not be part of the assessable value as it related to post-sale considerations. Citing precedents, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s position, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>