<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 265 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53192</link>
    <description>Enhanced customs valuation of imported second-hand monitors was upheld because the department&#039;s depreciation-based assessment, linked to the year of manufacture, was found rational and non-arbitrary. Import of restricted second-hand goods without a specific licence was treated as a breach of the foreign trade restrictions, so confiscation and penalty were sustained. The monetary consequences were moderated on the facts, with the redemption fine and penalty reduced in view of the valuation disparity between the declared value and the higher assessed value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 265 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53192</link>
      <description>Enhanced customs valuation of imported second-hand monitors was upheld because the department&#039;s depreciation-based assessment, linked to the year of manufacture, was found rational and non-arbitrary. Import of restricted second-hand goods without a specific licence was treated as a breach of the foreign trade restrictions, so confiscation and penalty were sustained. The monetary consequences were moderated on the facts, with the redemption fine and penalty reduced in view of the valuation disparity between the declared value and the higher assessed value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>