<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RETROSPECTIVE AMENDMENT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC HAZARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17172</link>
    <description>Retrospective restriction of Input Tax Credit under section 17(5)(d) is presented as a substantive narrowing of credit eligibility rather than a clarificatory drafting correction. The article argues that taxpayers undertaking commercial construction for taxable leasing relied on the earlier statutory wording and the functional approach to claim credit. It contends that retrospective denial may extinguish accrued rights, disrupt completed commercial arrangements, create unrecoverable tax costs, and undermine the seamless-credit objective of GST. It advocates prospective operation of any tightened restriction and administrative restraint on coercive recovery pending factual determination of eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:22:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RETROSPECTIVE AMENDMENT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC HAZARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17172</link>
      <description>Retrospective restriction of Input Tax Credit under section 17(5)(d) is presented as a substantive narrowing of credit eligibility rather than a clarificatory drafting correction. The article argues that taxpayers undertaking commercial construction for taxable leasing relied on the earlier statutory wording and the functional approach to claim credit. It contends that retrospective denial may extinguish accrued rights, disrupt completed commercial arrangements, create unrecoverable tax costs, and undermine the seamless-credit objective of GST. It advocates prospective operation of any tightened restriction and administrative restraint on coercive recovery pending factual determination of eligibility.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:22:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>