<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 268 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53189</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs in stock as on 1-4-2000 was governed by the then-applicable credit scheme and Notification No. 29/2000-C.E. (N.T.). The notification was read as allowing deemed credit at 12% of the invoice price, without limiting entitlement to the actual duty reflected in the documents. The contemporaneous circular was treated as consistent with credit on stock held on 1-4-2000, provided duty-paying documents were available. On that construction, actual duty-paid credit alone could not be imposed in place of the deemed credit mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:22:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 268 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53189</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs in stock as on 1-4-2000 was governed by the then-applicable credit scheme and Notification No. 29/2000-C.E. (N.T.). The notification was read as allowing deemed credit at 12% of the invoice price, without limiting entitlement to the actual duty reflected in the documents. The contemporaneous circular was treated as consistent with credit on stock held on 1-4-2000, provided duty-paying documents were available. On that construction, actual duty-paid credit alone could not be imposed in place of the deemed credit mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>