https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796910 Writ jurisdiction against GST registration cancellation should not ordinarily be exercised where allegations of wrongful input tax credit and breach of registration conditions require factual examination. In the absence of an inherent jurisdictional defect in the show-cause proceedings, revocation of cancellation and statutory appeal remain the appropriate remedies for factual adjudication. Interference under Article 226 was declined, while permitting pursuit of revocation and requiring expeditious, reasoned consideration of a timely application. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796910 Writ jurisdiction against GST registration cancellation should not ordinarily be exercised where allegations of wrongful input tax credit and breach of registration conditions require factual examination. In the absence of an inherent jurisdictional defect in the show-cause proceedings, revocation of cancellation and statutory appeal remain the appropriate remedies for factual adjudication. Interference under Article 226 was declined, while permitting pursuit of revocation and requiring expeditious, reasoned consideration of a timely application. Case-Laws GST Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796910