<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 261 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s order, and providing relief to the appellants. It ruled that the repair and reconditioning of old roller bearings did not constitute manufacturing, aligning with established legal interpretations and precedents. The decision emphasized that the repair process did not create a new product, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s direction to clear goods on payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 261 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s order, and providing relief to the appellants. It ruled that the repair and reconditioning of old roller bearings did not constitute manufacturing, aligning with established legal interpretations and precedents. The decision emphasized that the repair process did not create a new product, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s direction to clear goods on payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>