https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796861 Leave to appeal is not required where appellants were applicants before the writ court and the challenged order adjudicated their own intervention applications; stranger-to-order principles do not apply. Intervention in a finally disposed writ petition requires a demonstrated subsisting right affected by the writ order. Former directors relying only on apprehensions arising from collateral disputes were neither necessary nor proper parties. Final disposal renders the writ court functus officio, preventing intervention in concluded proceedings; consequently, recall need not be considered on merits. Rejection of the intervention applications stands, without prejudice to any independent remedy before the appropriate forum. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:19:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796861 Leave to appeal is not required where appellants were applicants before the writ court and the challenged order adjudicated their own intervention applications; stranger-to-order principles do not apply. Intervention in a finally disposed writ petition requires a demonstrated subsisting right affected by the writ order. Former directors relying only on apprehensions arising from collateral disputes were neither necessary nor proper parties. Final disposal renders the writ court functus officio, preventing intervention in concluded proceedings; consequently, recall need not be considered on merits. Rejection of the intervention applications stands, without prejudice to any independent remedy before the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796861