<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 266 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53184</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal from exporters concerning the alleged discrepancies in the consignment&#039;s Present Market Value and DEPB credit entitlement. The Tribunal found flaws in the adjudicator&#039;s reliance on market prices without cross-examination and emphasized that DEPB eligibility determination is within the DGFT&#039;s jurisdiction, not Customs. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, underscoring the importance of proper valuation procedures and jurisdictional adherence in export regulation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 266 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53184</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal from exporters concerning the alleged discrepancies in the consignment&#039;s Present Market Value and DEPB credit entitlement. The Tribunal found flaws in the adjudicator&#039;s reliance on market prices without cross-examination and emphasized that DEPB eligibility determination is within the DGFT&#039;s jurisdiction, not Customs. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, underscoring the importance of proper valuation procedures and jurisdictional adherence in export regulation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>