<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470875</link>
    <description>Explanation 2(1) to Section 147 applies only where an assessee has not furnished a return despite having taxable income above the maximum amount not chargeable to tax. Where the assessment record shows that a return was filed for the relevant assessment year, invoking that Explanation is inapplicable. Reliance on an inapplicable provision renders the recorded reasons for reopening and the consequential reassessment jurisdictionally defective, resulting in the reassessment being void ab initio and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470875</link>
      <description>Explanation 2(1) to Section 147 applies only where an assessee has not furnished a return despite having taxable income above the maximum amount not chargeable to tax. Where the assessment record shows that a return was filed for the relevant assessment year, invoking that Explanation is inapplicable. Reliance on an inapplicable provision renders the recorded reasons for reopening and the consequential reassessment jurisdictionally defective, resulting in the reassessment being void ab initio and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>