<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2062 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470879</link>
    <description>Denial of an opportunity to examine or cross-examine a person whose transactions formed the basis for treating amounts as suppressed turnover prejudices the taxpayer where the transaction&#039;s nature is materially disputed. The taxpayer sought to establish that the amounts were advances rather than turnover, and the taxpayer&#039;s documents and books-of-account data also required consideration. Fresh adjudication is required after permitting examination of the material person and considering the relevant records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2062 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470879</link>
      <description>Denial of an opportunity to examine or cross-examine a person whose transactions formed the basis for treating amounts as suppressed turnover prejudices the taxpayer where the transaction&#039;s nature is materially disputed. The taxpayer sought to establish that the amounts were advances rather than turnover, and the taxpayer&#039;s documents and books-of-account data also required consideration. Fresh adjudication is required after permitting examination of the material person and considering the relevant records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>