<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi court sets aside summon order in cheque bounce case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74244</link>
    <description>Vicarious criminal liability for cheque dishonour under section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not extend to a trust, because a trust is not a juristic person. A person cannot be summoned merely for alleged active involvement in a trust where the person was neither drawer nor signatory of the cheques, trustee, office-bearer, authorised account operator, guarantor, or executor of transaction documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:46:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:46:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi court sets aside summon order in cheque bounce case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74244</link>
      <description>Vicarious criminal liability for cheque dishonour under section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not extend to a trust, because a trust is not a juristic person. A person cannot be summoned merely for alleged active involvement in a trust where the person was neither drawer nor signatory of the cheques, trustee, office-bearer, authorised account operator, guarantor, or executor of transaction documents.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:46:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>