<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 224 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the respondent assessee could not claim a refund of duty based on a Supreme Court decision without challenging the levy of central excise duty. The Tribunal emphasized that unless the duty demand against the respondent was challenged before the appropriate authority, they could not claim a refund, even if the duty was paid under protest. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, stating that an application for refund cannot be equated to an appeal challenging the duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:33:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 224 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the respondent assessee could not claim a refund of duty based on a Supreme Court decision without challenging the levy of central excise duty. The Tribunal emphasized that unless the duty demand against the respondent was challenged before the appropriate authority, they could not claim a refund, even if the duty was paid under protest. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, stating that an application for refund cannot be equated to an appeal challenging the duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>