<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 661 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796788</link>
    <description>Contempt jurisdiction is confined to securing compliance with judicial directions and does not extend to independent challenges to administrative action. Failure to video record a statement was acknowledged as inadvertent; the unconditional apology was accepted, respondents were cautioned to comply scrupulously, and the scheduled personal hearing was required to be video recorded. The alleged absence of an administrative dispatch signature on an office copy of a show-cause notice did not concern compliance with prior directions and could not be examined in contempt proceedings. The notice&#039;s validity was left to independent remedies available in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 661 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796788</link>
      <description>Contempt jurisdiction is confined to securing compliance with judicial directions and does not extend to independent challenges to administrative action. Failure to video record a statement was acknowledged as inadvertent; the unconditional apology was accepted, respondents were cautioned to comply scrupulously, and the scheduled personal hearing was required to be video recorded. The alleged absence of an administrative dispatch signature on an office copy of a show-cause notice did not concern compliance with prior directions and could not be examined in contempt proceedings. The notice&#039;s validity was left to independent remedies available in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>