<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 220 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the benefit to the party for excisable goods sent on &#039;loan basis&#039; without following Excise formalities and payment of duty. The lack of proper documentation and failure to adhere to statutory requirements resulted in the rejection of the appeal, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the party&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:07:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 220 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the benefit to the party for excisable goods sent on &#039;loan basis&#039; without following Excise formalities and payment of duty. The lack of proper documentation and failure to adhere to statutory requirements resulted in the rejection of the appeal, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the party&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>