<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 647 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796774</link>
    <description>Rejection of a VCES declaration is appealable; a departmental circular cannot override High Court decisions recognising maintainability. Pre-declaration payments must be reckoned towards VCES declared tax dues where they relate to the tax dispute covered by the declaration. Entitlement to settlement therefore requires factual verification of the nexus between earlier deposits and the declared dispute, and rejection solely on non-maintainability cannot stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 647 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796774</link>
      <description>Rejection of a VCES declaration is appealable; a departmental circular cannot override High Court decisions recognising maintainability. Pre-declaration payments must be reckoned towards VCES declared tax dues where they relate to the tax dispute covered by the declaration. Entitlement to settlement therefore requires factual verification of the nexus between earlier deposits and the declared dispute, and rejection solely on non-maintainability cannot stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>