<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 652 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796779</link>
    <description>Service tax liability under Sections 65B(44), 66B and 66E(e) turns on whether an arrangement constitutes a service, including an agreement to do or refrain from an act. The analysis distinguishes assignment or transfer of copyright from the provision of a taxable service and examines whether consideration is linked to an underlying activity. Consideration alone does not determine taxability without identifying a qualifying service under the statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 652 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796779</link>
      <description>Service tax liability under Sections 65B(44), 66B and 66E(e) turns on whether an arrangement constitutes a service, including an agreement to do or refrain from an act. The analysis distinguishes assignment or transfer of copyright from the provision of a taxable service and examines whether consideration is linked to an underlying activity. Consideration alone does not determine taxability without identifying a qualifying service under the statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>