<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2049 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470818</link>
    <description>Site-formation services performed by a sub-contractor, including excavation, preparation, drilling and blasting, do not qualify as construction of a dam under the relevant exemption where the services are rendered to an intervening contractor rather than directly for the Government. However, rejection of the alternative works-contract exemption requires fresh adjudication because authorities on deemed transfer of property in goods, VAT deductions, material consumption and the nature of the activity were not adequately considered. Extended limitation must also be reconsidered in light of the claimed bona fide belief, while threshold exemption and cum-tax valuation require consideration if any demand survives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2049 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470818</link>
      <description>Site-formation services performed by a sub-contractor, including excavation, preparation, drilling and blasting, do not qualify as construction of a dam under the relevant exemption where the services are rendered to an intervening contractor rather than directly for the Government. However, rejection of the alternative works-contract exemption requires fresh adjudication because authorities on deemed transfer of property in goods, VAT deductions, material consumption and the nature of the activity were not adequately considered. Extended limitation must also be reconsidered in light of the claimed bona fide belief, while threshold exemption and cum-tax valuation require consideration if any demand survives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>