<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1886 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470837</link>
    <description>A single composite show cause notice under Section 74 cannot validly combine distinct tax periods or financial years. Each tax period must be addressed separately under the statutory scheme; clubbing multiple periods renders the notice jurisdictionally defective. Where adjudication and appellate proceedings are founded on such a composite notice, the defect extends to the consequential orders and proceedings, which are liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1886 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470837</link>
      <description>A single composite show cause notice under Section 74 cannot validly combine distinct tax periods or financial years. Each tax period must be addressed separately under the statutory scheme; clubbing multiple periods renders the notice jurisdictionally defective. Where adjudication and appellate proceedings are founded on such a composite notice, the defect extends to the consequential orders and proceedings, which are liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>