https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74221 Delhi High Court required Arvind Kejriwal to reply to Enforcement Directorate petitions challenging his acquittal in proceedings concerning alleged non-compliance with summonses. The trial court found that the agency had not proved intentional disobedience, service of summons through email, or lawful issuance of electronic summons under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appellate challenge concerns proof of service, validity of electronic summons, and intentional non-compliance. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:46:03 +0530 Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:46:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74221 Delhi High Court required Arvind Kejriwal to reply to Enforcement Directorate petitions challenging his acquittal in proceedings concerning alleged non-compliance with summonses. The trial court found that the agency had not proved intentional disobedience, service of summons through email, or lawful issuance of electronic summons under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The appellate challenge concerns proof of service, validity of electronic summons, and intentional non-compliance. News - Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74221