<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 214 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53153</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected, upholding the confiscation of the electrical connection apparatus as consumer goods due to the absence of a specific import license. Despite being imported in CKD condition and assembled in India for office use, the goods were considered consumer items under the IPC policy as they satisfied human needs. The Commissioner (Appeals) found the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the goods&#039; usage and treatments lacking specificity, leading to the affirmation of the confiscation and dismissal of the request to reduce the redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:53:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 214 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53153</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected, upholding the confiscation of the electrical connection apparatus as consumer goods due to the absence of a specific import license. Despite being imported in CKD condition and assembled in India for office use, the goods were considered consumer items under the IPC policy as they satisfied human needs. The Commissioner (Appeals) found the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the goods&#039; usage and treatments lacking specificity, leading to the affirmation of the confiscation and dismissal of the request to reduce the redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>