<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1776 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470798</link>
    <description>Rejection of Service Exports from India Scheme benefits was inconsistent with an applicable Division Bench ruling on a similar claim. That ruling had invalidated cancellation of the relevant scrips, directed removal from the Denied Entry List, and set aside the penalty. The rejection order therefore could not be sustained and was set aside, restoring the claimant&#039;s position under the Scheme in line with the earlier ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1776 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470798</link>
      <description>Rejection of Service Exports from India Scheme benefits was inconsistent with an applicable Division Bench ruling on a similar claim. That ruling had invalidated cancellation of the relevant scrips, directed removal from the Denied Entry List, and set aside the penalty. The rejection order therefore could not be sustained and was set aside, restoring the claimant&#039;s position under the Scheme in line with the earlier ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>