https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17149 Article 32 may be invoked directly to seek FIR quashing only in exceptional circumstances involving a demonstrated infringement of fundamental rights or compelling urgency. Although the jurisdiction is wide and cannot be rendered ineffective where liberty is palpably threatened, orderly procedure ordinarily requires recourse to the High Court under Article 226 and inherent criminal jurisdiction. A petitioner must show why the High Court remedy is unavailable, ineffective or futile. Mere claims of non-involvement, ignorance of transactions, or third-party misuse of a bank account do not alone establish the exceptional basis required for direct Article 32 intervention. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:38:39 +0530 Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:38:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17149 Article 32 may be invoked directly to seek FIR quashing only in exceptional circumstances involving a demonstrated infringement of fundamental rights or compelling urgency. Although the jurisdiction is wide and cannot be rendered ineffective where liberty is palpably threatened, orderly procedure ordinarily requires recourse to the High Court under Article 226 and inherent criminal jurisdiction. A petitioner must show why the High Court remedy is unavailable, ineffective or futile. Mere claims of non-involvement, ignorance of transactions, or third-party misuse of a bank account do not alone establish the exceptional basis required for direct Article 32 intervention. Articles Other Topics Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:38:39 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17149