<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 246 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Cylinder Holding Charges, collected by gas manufacturers post-1-7-2000, are not includible in the assessable value of gases under Section 4(3)(d). These charges were deemed penal, applicable only when customers retained cylinders beyond the free period, and not directly related to the sale of gases. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 246 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Cylinder Holding Charges, collected by gas manufacturers post-1-7-2000, are not includible in the assessable value of gases under Section 4(3)(d). These charges were deemed penal, applicable only when customers retained cylinders beyond the free period, and not directly related to the sale of gases. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>