<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 593 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796720</link>
    <description>Service-tax liability and interest remain enforceable where the taxpayer admitted liability and paid both amounts, which were appropriated in adjudication. Suppression sufficient to invoke extended limitation and impose penalty requires a positive, deliberate act of concealment intended to evade tax; delayed payment following an interpretational dispute does not by itself establish suppression. Penalties for non-payment, registration and return defaults were unsustainable where the relevant penalty provision had been omitted without saving, the alleged default differed from the show-cause notice, and prompt registration and payment demonstrated bona fide belief and reasonable cause. Penal consequences therefore did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 593 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796720</link>
      <description>Service-tax liability and interest remain enforceable where the taxpayer admitted liability and paid both amounts, which were appropriated in adjudication. Suppression sufficient to invoke extended limitation and impose penalty requires a positive, deliberate act of concealment intended to evade tax; delayed payment following an interpretational dispute does not by itself establish suppression. Penalties for non-payment, registration and return defaults were unsustainable where the relevant penalty provision had been omitted without saving, the alleged default differed from the show-cause notice, and prompt registration and payment demonstrated bona fide belief and reasonable cause. Penal consequences therefore did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>