<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 594 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796721</link>
    <description>Letter-of-credit charges recovered by a trader from high-seas-sale buyers formed part of the composite consideration for imported goods under a principal-to-principal sale arrangement. Issuance of the letter of credit, including the payment guarantee, was performed by the bank rather than the trader, so no service-provider and service-recipient relationship existed between the trader and buyer for banking or financial services. Reimbursement alone did not constitute consideration for a service. Following introduction of the negative-list regime, the transaction remained a transfer of title in goods, and inseverable pre-import letter-of-credit costs could not be separated for service-tax levy. No service tax was payable on those charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 594 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796721</link>
      <description>Letter-of-credit charges recovered by a trader from high-seas-sale buyers formed part of the composite consideration for imported goods under a principal-to-principal sale arrangement. Issuance of the letter of credit, including the payment guarantee, was performed by the bank rather than the trader, so no service-provider and service-recipient relationship existed between the trader and buyer for banking or financial services. Reimbursement alone did not constitute consideration for a service. Following introduction of the negative-list regime, the transaction remained a transfer of title in goods, and inseverable pre-import letter-of-credit costs could not be separated for service-tax levy. No service tax was payable on those charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>