https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796758 GST adjudication challenges requiring factual and evidentiary appraisal, including objections to electronic evidence, forensic authentication, cross-examination and an earlier audit, must be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy. The appellate mechanism under the CGST Act permits reconsideration of both facts and law. Participation in adjudication through an authorised representative, attendance at the hearing and submission of a detailed reply undermine allegations of defective service, inadequate consideration or denial of effective hearing unless a patent natural-justice breach and resulting prejudice are demonstrated. Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable where an efficacious appeal exists, absent a jurisdictional error or another recognised exceptional circumstance. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:37:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796758 GST adjudication challenges requiring factual and evidentiary appraisal, including objections to electronic evidence, forensic authentication, cross-examination and an earlier audit, must be pursued through the statutory appellate remedy. The appellate mechanism under the CGST Act permits reconsideration of both facts and law. Participation in adjudication through an authorised representative, attendance at the hearing and submission of a detailed reply undermine allegations of defective service, inadequate consideration or denial of effective hearing unless a patent natural-justice breach and resulting prejudice are demonstrated. Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable where an efficacious appeal exists, absent a jurisdictional error or another recognised exceptional circumstance. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796758