<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1841 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470793</link>
    <description>Section 50C(1)&#039;s 10% safe harbour applies retrospectively as a curative measure to prevent hardship in genuine transactions. Where the difference between actual purchase consideration and the value determined by the Departmental Valuation Officer is within that threshold, the DVO value replaces the stamp duty value for applying the safe harbour. A valuation difference of 7.40% therefore does not support an addition under section 56(2)(vii), and the addition is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 23:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1841 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470793</link>
      <description>Section 50C(1)&#039;s 10% safe harbour applies retrospectively as a curative measure to prevent hardship in genuine transactions. Where the difference between actual purchase consideration and the value determined by the Departmental Valuation Officer is within that threshold, the DVO value replaces the stamp duty value for applying the safe harbour. A valuation difference of 7.40% therefore does not support an addition under section 56(2)(vii), and the addition is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>