<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1458 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470786</link>
    <description>A retrospective amendment to Section 9, effective from 1 June 1976, required reconsideration of an earlier judgment. The Supreme Court had permitted the Revenue to seek review because the amendment operated retrospectively despite being enacted after the original judgment. The subsequent Supreme Court authority and retrospective statutory change warranted review and recall of the earlier decision, with the income-tax appeals restored for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 13:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1458 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470786</link>
      <description>A retrospective amendment to Section 9, effective from 1 June 1976, required reconsideration of an earlier judgment. The Supreme Court had permitted the Revenue to seek review because the amendment operated retrospectively despite being enacted after the original judgment. The subsequent Supreme Court authority and retrospective statutory change warranted review and recall of the earlier decision, with the income-tax appeals restored for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>