<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1635 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470784</link>
    <description>Claimed loss from forward contracts for coriander was rejected as non-genuine because the transactions lacked payment, delivery, broker or exchange involvement, independent verification, and commercial explanation, and were settled only through journal entries. Applying the burden of proof, substance-over-form approach and test of human probabilities, the loss was treated as arising from sham arrangements designed to create a tax set-off against share-trading profits. The asserted commodity-contract loss was also speculative and could not be set off against non-speculative business income. The disallowance of the loss and denial of its adjustment against share-trading income remained effective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 11:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1635 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470784</link>
      <description>Claimed loss from forward contracts for coriander was rejected as non-genuine because the transactions lacked payment, delivery, broker or exchange involvement, independent verification, and commercial explanation, and were settled only through journal entries. Applying the burden of proof, substance-over-form approach and test of human probabilities, the loss was treated as arising from sham arrangements designed to create a tax set-off against share-trading profits. The asserted commodity-contract loss was also speculative and could not be set off against non-speculative business income. The disallowance of the loss and denial of its adjustment against share-trading income remained effective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>