<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2154 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470781</link>
    <description>A delay in filing an appeal requires a supported explanation demonstrating reasonable diligence and justifiable cause. The stated non-receipt of the appellate order, reliance on an earlier tax consultant, and personal circumstances were unsupported by evidence of efforts to ascertain the appeal&#039;s status during the intervening period. The delay was therefore not condoned, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:32:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2154 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470781</link>
      <description>A delay in filing an appeal requires a supported explanation demonstrating reasonable diligence and justifiable cause. The stated non-receipt of the appellate order, reliance on an earlier tax consultant, and personal circumstances were unsupported by evidence of efforts to ascertain the appeal&#039;s status during the intervening period. The delay was therefore not condoned, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>